Asbestos & Mesothelioma Law Blog

Woman’s Death Linked to Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure

November 18, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this article will be referred to as A.M.B. and her ex-husband, Mr. A.B.

In a recent court decision, a judge denied an asbestos company’s motion to dismiss the mesothelioma lawsuit and allowed the case to proceed. The tragic death of the mesothelioma victim, A.M.B., that occurred due to second-hand asbestos exposure draws attention to the dangers of this type of exposure. Second-hand asbestos exposure occurs when someone brings asbestos fibers home on clothing or other personal items, putting their family at risk. This indirect exposure can be just as dangerous as direct exposure.

After years of unknowingly inhaling asbestos fibers when washing her ex-husband’s clothing, A.M.B. developed malignant mesothelioma. Mr. A.B. had used DAP Inc.’s products in his home and hardware business. A.M.B.’s family filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that their products were responsible for her illness. The company tried to dismiss the case by arguing that the plaintiffs had not established a link between A.M.B.’s illness and their products. The court denied the defendant’s motion.

Asbestos Company’s Motion to Overturn Mesothelioma Verdict Denied

November 14, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this case will be referred to as T.C.

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently denied an asbestos company’s motion to overturn a mesothelioma verdict. T.C. was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a rare and deadly form of cancer, almost eight years ago, and over two years ago, a jury ordered his employer to pay his surviving loved ones $2.3 million in damages after concluding that the employer was liable for T.C.’s illness. Despite there being enough evidence to prove that the employer played a role in T.C.’s illness and the verdict, the employer sought to overturn the decision by filing a motion for a retrial or entry of a judgment in their favor. According to Lenox Instrument Company (employer), T.C.’s family had failed to prove its (the employer’s) role in his disease.

Mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive type of cancer that primarily affects the lungs, abdomen, or heart. This illness occurs after someone is exposed to asbestos, a fibrous mineral that was once widely used in construction, manufacturing, and other industries. When asbestos is left undisturbed, it does not pose any threat. However, when disturbed, asbestos releases tiny fibers into the air, which, when inhaled or ingested, can get stuck in the body, resulting in inflammation and cellular damage over time. This damage can eventually cause mesothelioma.

Judge Denies Burnham Boiler’s Bid to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim in Mesothelioma Case

November 12, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this case will be referred to as A.F.

In a recent court case, a New York County Supreme Court judge denied Burnham LLC’s request to dismiss a punitive damages claim in a mesothelioma lawsuit. A.F., a former worker, was exposed to asbestos through Burnham boilers and other asbestos-contaminated equipment. A.F. and his wife filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for compensatory and punitive damages from Burnham LLC. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the claim for punitive damages, but that motion was denied.

After suffering mesothelioma, a victim can file a personal injury lawsuit and seek compensatory damages, which aim to make up for direct losses. Compensatory damages include medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Mesothelioma victims’ spouses can also seek compensation for loss of companionship and support. In a mesothelioma claim, victims and their families can also seek punitive damages. Unlike compensatory damages, punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for particularly reckless or harmful behavior. These damages are intended to send a message to others and warn them against acting in the same manner as the defendant.

Pennsylvania Couple Awarded $3.8 Million in a Boilermaker Mesothelioma Case against Foster Wheeler

November 10, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this case will be referred to as H.C. and his wife as R.C.

In a recent court decision, an Allegheny County jury awarded a mesothelioma victim and his wife almost $4 million in damages. H.C. received a malignant mesothelioma diagnosis after working as a boilermaker for a long time. After his diagnosis, H.C. and his wife, R.C., filed a lawsuit against Foster Wheeler, his former employer. H.C. blamed Foster Wheeler for his mesothelioma. H.C. claimed that the company failed to protect workers from asbestos exposure, leading to his illness. Mesothelioma is one of the illnesses that can develop after a person is exposed to asbestos. After listening to the case, the jury found Foster Wheeler liable for H.C.’s illness.

The jury learned that in the many years that H.C. was a boilermaker, he only worked for Foster Wheeler for ten weeks. Foster Wheeler provides engineering services, manufactures boilers, and services boilers across the U.S. and worldwide. Despite the existence of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations meant to prevent mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses, Foster Wheeler did not comply with these regulations. Foster Wheeler’s legal representatives argued that other companies owned the site were responsible for ensuring workers were safe. However, the jury found that it was the defendant’s negligence that directly contributed to Mr. H.C.’s fatal illness.

Asbestos Exposure Risks for Oil Refinery Workers

November 8, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

Asbestos, a naturally occurring mineral once admired for its insulating and resistance properties, is widely known as a dangerous substance that can cause several illnesses, including mesothelioma. Despite the known dangers of asbestos, this substance was widely used in various industries, including oil refineries. While asbestos is no longer widely used, it still poses significant risks to oil refinery workers. In this article, we discuss asbestos exposure risks for oil refinery workers. Hopefully, the information in this article can help with the implementation of effective safety measures that can protect oil refinery workers and other workers from asbestos exposure.

Historical Use of Asbestos in Oil Refineries

Before the 1908s, asbestos use was prevalent in oil refineries due to its fire and heat-resistant properties. This resulted in many oil refinery workers getting exposed to asbestos and being put at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. Asbestos was commonly used in areas with particularly higher temperatures and pressures. Workers in certain areas of oil refineries, including boiler rooms, ovens, furnaces, and reactors, were at the greatest risk of asbestos exposure. Asbestos was used in various applications, including the following;

Virginia Jury Grants $3.45 Million to the Family of a Deceased Mesothelioma Victim

November 6, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

For purposes of this article, the mesothelioma victim in this case will be referred to as J.K.

In a recent court case, a Virginia jury awarded $3.45 million to the family of a deceased mesothelioma victim in a case against John Crane, Inc., a company known for manufacturing asbestos-contaminated products. The victim in this case, who will be referred to as J.K., died of malignant mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer that is primarily caused by asbestos exposure in 2022. After his death, J.K.’s family filed a lawsuit against John Crane, Inc., alleging that J.K.’s occupational asbestos exposure occurred while he was working with asbestos-containing products made by the company. Recently, a jury hearing the case ruled in favor of J.K.’s family and held John Crane, Inc. responsible for its failure to adequately warn about the dangers of its products.

During the trial, jury members listened to details about J.K.’s career as a millwright. For around 18 years (between 1961 and 1979), J.K. was a millwright at a plant in Chesterfield County. While there, his responsibilities included repairing and maintaining equipment such as valves and pumps. Unfortunately, when carrying out his tasks, he unknowingly inhaled microscopic asbestos fibers, putting himself at risk of developing mesothelioma. The jury heard evidence that over time, the wear and tear of the parts that J.K. repaired and maintained caused asbestos fibers to break free, contaminating the air in the workplace.

What is the Average Wrongful Death Settlement for Mesothelioma?

November 3, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

Mesothelioma is a rare but aggressive form of cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure. The prognosis of this illness is often poor. Many times, mesothelioma symptoms appear years after initial exposure. Because of this, mesothelioma is often diagnosed when it has advanced to later stages. Sadly, this means that many people die due to mesothelioma every year, leaving families devastated and facing significant financial burdens. However, for some families, it may be possible to file a wrongful death claim and seek compensation. A common question that families ask is, “What is the average wrongful death settlement for mesothelioma?”

What is Wrongful Death?

Not all families who lose their loved one due to mesothelioma can file a wrongful death claim and seek compensation. Only those whose loved one’s death was caused by another party’s negligence or misconduct are eligible to file a wrongful death claim. Often, wrongful death claims arise because companies failed to warn workers or consumers about the dangers of asbestos exposure. Manufacturers and contractors who fail to warn or protect people from the risks of asbestos exposure can also be held liable in wrongful death claims. Spouses, children, parents, other dependents, or the representative of a mesothelioma victim’s estate can file a wrongful death claim and seek various types of damages.

Mesothelioma Researcher Wins Legal Battle Against Johnson & Johnson

October 27, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

A significant legal victory was recently achieved when a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Johnson & Johnson (J&J) against a mesothelioma researcher. For long, mesothelioma victims have encountered challenges when trying to hold companies liable for their asbestos exposure. Many asbestos companies have defended themselves by challenging scientific evidence. Often, these companies argue that there is no conclusive proof that asbestos exposure causes mesothelioma. They focus on the methods and data and refuse to accept responsibility. Most recently, J&J filed a lawsuit against a mesothelioma scientist whose research suggests that talc-based consumer products can cause cancer. However, the judge dismissed the giant pharmaceutical company’s suit, emphasizing the researcher’s right to free speech. The judge also found no evidence to show that the researcher’s findings were false.

J&J has faced tens of thousands of lawsuits filed by victims of mesothelioma and ovarian cancer who used the company’s talc-based baby powder. The victims blame the talc-based baby powder for their asbestos exposure, which, in turn, caused their illnesses. The claimants argue that J&J failed to adequately warn consumers about the potential dangers associated with their product. In response to the lawsuits against them, J&J has employed several strategies, including creating a subsidiary, LLT Management, that proceeded to file for bankruptcy. The company has also filed lawsuits against researchers, including one prominent mesothelioma researcher, Dr. Jacqueline Moline.

Plaintiffs have presented internal J&J documents describing fears over the company’s talc’s connection to cancer. Despite this, the company still filed lawsuits against several researchers. Johnson & Johnson has not only attacked the researchers’ studies but has also accused one of the researchers, Dr. Jacqueline Moline, of libel, fraud, and false advertising in connection to the paper she published that connects asbestos-containing talcum powder products to mesothelioma.

Weakness and Fatigue in Mesothelioma Patients

October 20, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

Mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive type of cancer that affects the mesothelium (the protective membrane covering most internal organs), is primarily caused by asbestos exposure. Unfortunately, there is still no cure for mesothelioma. However, there are several mesothelioma treatment options. After a person is diagnosed with mesothelioma and undergoes treatment, they may experience weakness and fatigue. The cancer itself, treatment, poor nutrition, and other factors are to blame for the weakness and fatigue mesothelioma patients experience. Below is more on weakness and fatigue in mesothelioma patients.

Weakness vs. Fatigue?

Weakness and fatigue are two words that are often used together or interchangeably. However, while related, weakness and fatigue are not the same thing. Weakness is the lack of physical strength or the ability to exert force with muscles. A weak person may find it hard to move or have difficulty moving parts of their body. Weakness makes it hard to perform tasks that require muscle strength, such as lifting items, climbing stairs, etc. Weakness can end up causing fatigue.

J&J Files Third Bankruptcy Application to Resolve Mesothelioma and Ovarian Cancer Claims

October 18, 2024 | Throneberry Law Group

The giant pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is facing thousands of personal injury claims from people who blame the company’s talc products for ovarian cancer and malignant mesothelioma. After previously filing two bankruptcy claims and both claims being rejected by victims and courts, J&J recently made another attempt to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The company hopes that the latest bankruptcy filing, which proposes a $10 billion compensation plan for victims and their families, will end litigation against it. So far, this third bankruptcy filing has received a vote of confidence from many victims.

When companies are hit with thousands of lawsuits alleging harm from their products, they face the risk of multi-million or even billion-dollar verdicts. Over the years, several ovarian cancer and mesothelioma victims who blame J&J’s talc-based products for their illnesses have been awarded multi-million dollar verdicts. Such financial judgments can be overwhelming. These substantial verdicts were the reason J&J pursued bankruptcy twice before. Bankruptcy provides a way for companies to manage and limit their financial exposure. By filing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, also called reorganization bankruptcy, a company can propose a restructured plan to compensate victims and their families without having to pay out huge, unpredictable verdicts that could cripple the business financially. After a company files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the “automatic stay” halts ongoing litigation and prevents people from filing new cases. In the case of J&J, this third bankruptcy filing has stopped thousands of lawsuits from moving forward. If the bankruptcy is approved, the company can implement its proposed compensation plan.

Johnson & Johnson filed its first bankruptcy case in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the second case in Trenton, New Jersey. Both efforts were unsuccessful, as victims and courts rejected both cases. The third time, J&J filed its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in Houston, Texas, immediately halting thousands of pending lawsuits. While J&J’s latest bankruptcy filing has garnered support from many victims with pending claims, the company still faces opposition from some victims and their attorneys, who are seeking higher compensation and more accountability from the pharmaceutical company.